Learning activities The project study entity includes group work, workshop events, and supervision – all are mandatory activities. The events are designed to support the students to identify a topic, define a research question, select methods for data collection and analysis, select literature, conduct data analysis, discuss findings related to literature, and finally writing up the project report. These activities are planned in such a way that it supports the students’ participation in the IT-mediated Global Work practices simultaneously. COURSE activities: Learning activities comprises lectures and exercises, as well as readings in the course compendium each week, as well as participation in the ViBUgame. PROJECT activities: In the project work activities the students will - with supervision and workshop activities support - be divided into groups, depending upon their interests. Each project group must define as research question within the specialization: Global Relations and Networked Practices, and investigate this research question, bringing in theory from the both courses in the specialization. They will have to identify an empirical case, plan the data collection and analysis, and finally write a report strictly following particular guidelines and template.
Exam: D1G: Hand-in for groups followed by one exam divided into two parts: 1) Group exam based upon the hand-in, and overall impressions based upon oral exam and hand-ins learning outcomes and an 2) individual oral exam based upon the learning outcomes from the course curriculum. Duration of exam - in total: 20 minutes per student incl. assessment and feedback Final grade is based upon two parts: 1) the group work including the project report and the oral group exam, and 2) then the individual oral exam. Project reports created collectively by student groups forms the basis for the group exam. The examiner and the external examiner will prior to the exam read the project report, which then exist as the basis for the oral exam. The oral exam contains of two parts: Group exam and Individual exam Group exam, here each participant make a short 5 min presentation concerning a particular part of the project, followed by a group discussion (5 min pr. student; group of 4 equals 20 min discussion) on the project in general related to the overall specialization Global Relation and Networked Practices. Intended learning outcomes In the group exam the students must demonstrate their abilities to: • Identify, define and delimit a research question within the topic area of Global Relation and Networked Practices • Identify and analyze relevant means for investigating the research question, including literature, methods, technologies, and empirical cases • Combine the selected means, develop them further if necessary, and apply them in in the effort of examining the research question. • Report in a coherent and stringent way the research question, the background research, the methods, empirical work, and the findings, while adhering to the academic standards strictly following the pre-determined guidelines. • Reflect upon the research question, the chosen approach, the achieved findings, and selected literature. • Based on the project work, be able to describe and discuss a master thesis synopsis Individual exam, here each student participates in 10 min individual oral exam without preparation, where the student is expected to demonstrate fulfilling the learning outcomes through discussions with the examiner. Intended learning outcomes At the individual exam the student must demonstrate their ability to: • Discuss theoretical concepts and insights from computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) research related to globally distributed collaboration (e.g. ViBU game) • Analyze a globally distributed collaborative situation (e.g. ViBU game) and the use of collaborative technologies by applying the theoretical concepts from CSCW • Identify challenging as well as enabling conditions, which serve as the foundation for globally distributed collaboration (e.g. ViBU game) and suggest how these might be addressed based upon theoretical as well as practical arguments • Participate competently in globally distributed collaboration by acting pro-actively in terms of making the collaboration function and bringing in collaborative technologies